|
SINGLE MOTHER NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY
|
|
|
This site designed with Microsoft FrontPage and best viewed with Internet Explorer |
 |
|
The S&R PIEPER FOUNDATION employed the services of The
Dieringer Research Group to conduct a survey of W-2 recipients and non-recipients
followed directly by a survey of organizations providing services to the
economically disadvantaged. This project is based upon research performed
in Milwaukee, Wisconsin and the surrounding area.
This project was completed in three phases:
-
Initially a Focus Group was
organized to discuss what causes people to go on welfare and what would
enable them to get off welfare.
-
A telephone survey was then
conducted of recipients and non-recipients to obtain their thoughts on this
subject.
-
Finally, a questionnaire was mailed to organizations available in the
Milwaukee County area for the economically disadvantaged.
Accordingly, this site presents pertinent information in the following
structure with a Project Summary at the end of
this page:
Project Summary
Background and Methodology
At the request of the S & R Pieper Family Foundation, The
Dieringer Research Group designed a research study regarding the needs of single
parent families. The purpose of this study was to explore how individuals,
living at or below a poverty existence, feel about the services that are
available and whether or not the available services are meeting their needs. The
study was a three phase research project, designed to understand the issues
facing single parents and to get feedback directly from those most involved and
able to articulate their successes or concerns.
In order to meet the study objectives, three separate, but
inter-related, studies were conducted.
|
|
Phase One: Qualitative focus
groups with single mothers (one group currently using W-2 and one group who
qualified but not currently using W-2). This phase was conducted to
initially uncover and discuss the needs of single mothers who were using W-2
compared to those who were not, as well as understand why single mothers
eligible for W-2 benefits were not utilizing the program. Opinions on the
success of the W-2 program were also discussed.
|
|
|
|
|
Phase Two: Quantitative telephone interviews with 400
single mothers (200 currently using W-2 and 200 who qualify for W-2 but not
currently using W-2). This phase was conducted to test the issues and
concerns uncovered in the first phase among a larger sample of the single
mother population.
|
|
|
|
|
Phase Three: A mail survey of 654 social service
agencies in Milwaukee County, with 102 qualified organizations that returned a
completed questionnaire. This final phase was designed to inventory and
profile social services agencies operating in Milwaukee County and determine
the gaps in the services needed versus available to single parent families.
|
Summary of Phase One: Qualitative Focus Groups
|
|
Respondents in both focus groups responded similarly to a
question regarding the needs of single mothers, including money to pay rent
(shelter), food, clothing, child care, education, reliable after-school
programs, health benefits, transportation, quality education for children, time
to spend with children, education for themselves, job training, decent wages,
"child support paid," emotional support ("support groups")
and "occasional time for myself." |
|
|
|
|
They understood that a variety of circumstances can cause
people to apply for assistance programs and services, such as health problems,
drug addiction, divorce, crime, mental illness, abuse, teen pregnancy,
"poor planning," no reliable child care, a lack of education, and lack
of job skills. |
|
|
|
|
A major difference between single mothers on W-2 and those
who were not on W-2 was that those who were not on W-2 consisted of the
"working poor" sometimes working two to three jobs and still could not
make ends meet. Although proud of themselves, the "working poor" were
still frustrated about their chances of improving their lives, properly raising
their children, and acquiring benefits that would provide them with a sense of
security. |
|
|
|
|
There seemed to be a realization that family and friends can
make a difference in the lives of low income single mothers, either providing
financial or emotional support. Several respondents said that coming from a
family culture encouraging hard work and persistence also contributed to
self-empowerment. |
|
|
|
|
Not everyone was aware of the services available to them or
how to access them. And those who were aware of available services said that it
can be a "hassle" to apply for them. |
|
|
|
|
One concern from participants was the quality of day care
available. They expressed both concern and fear about their options as well as
concern on how to handle days when their children were sick. |
|
|
|
|
Several respondents, especially those not on W-2, felt that
the abuses of past assistance created W-2. The haste to make people work, at any
job, created another set of problems. A program that stressed working without
offering higher education or job skills/training was considered a limited way of
empowering individuals. |
|
|
|
|
According to some respondents, W-2 is creating another type
of "slave" or caste system made up of people who are prepared to
work only in minimum wage jobs. Although respondents understood the basic
concept of job training and working instead of "receiving welfare,"
they said the jobs and job training available were keeping them in dead-end
situations. |
|
|
|
|
Respondents in both groups said they felt that the
"ticket" to improving their lives was both job training and higher
education, in particular college courses. There were questions about why W-2
included opportunities to finish high school, but not college. |
|
|
|
|
Respondents believe that under W-2, there should be a plan
tailored to meet the needs of each individual, rather than a cookie-cutter
approach treating each person, with different circumstances, the same. |
|
|
|
|
Participants expressed that one of the major problems with
the W-2 system was the Financial Employment Planners (FEPS) they work with.
There were reports that W-2 workers looked down upon participants, were rude,
lazy, overly aggressive in "sanctioning" participants for
"perceived violations," and even purposefully sabotaged their
opportunities for success. A few individuals suggested more training for the
FEPs on "working with the public." |
Summary of Phase Two: 400 Quantitative Interviews
|
|
Similar to the results of the focus groups, these single
mothers mentioned the same needs. It became clear the needs were inter-related,
in that they need money to live on, a decent job, and health care benefits to
afford child care, more education, education, food, and shelter. |
|
|
|
|
A variety of circumstances were said to cause a need for
assistance, such as unemployment, lack of child care, lack of education, medical
problems, and lack of a support system. |
|
|
|
|
As in the focus groups, not all women were aware of the
services available, with almost 20% unable to name even one service or program
to assist single mothers with financial needs. And again, many (39%) said it was
difficult to access the services, either due to a lack of information or the
hassle involved in applying for the assistance. |
|
|
|
|
Almost two-thirds (63%) of respondents, both users and
non-users of W-2, thought there was a problem with the W-2 system, including the
quality of job training, an uncaring staff, slow services, and low pay. |
|
|
|
|
The majority (79%) agreed1 W-2 should have a plan to address
the specific needs of the individual, another issue uncovered in the focus group
results. |
|
|
|
|
In terms of job training, the respondents claimed that
inadequate job training or "just any job" were not solutions to make
them financially independent. The majority of respondents agreed2 affordable day
care (94%), job training (91%), employer sponsored programs to try out a job
(89%), centralized services in their neighborhood (89%), and affordable health
care (88%) were solutions to help single mothers get off assistance programs. |
|
|
|
|
A large percentage of respondents felt that education on how
to handle money and birth control education could be used as a way to get people
off financial assistance programs, with 84% and 76% of the response,
respectively. |
Phase Three: Inventory of 102 Social Service Agencies3
|
|
Responding organizations more frequently offered services for
children/youth (47%), child care/day care (35%), food/clothing assistance (29%),
programs on self-esteem (27%) or transportation (25%). |
|
|
|
|
Not many of the responding organizations offered educational
services and job related services, identified as key components to financial
independence. Only about one-fifth of organizations offered these type of
services, with 20% offering job search training (resume writing, want ads,
interviewing skills), 19% offering job training, and 18% offering career
counseling (determine interest and skills for a job). Fifteen percent of
responding organizations offered employment search services, providing help in
locating a job. Only 9% of responding organizations offered educational
services, either high school, technical or college, less than one-tenth of the
responding organizations. |
|
|
|
|
Twenty percent of organizations offered financial counseling
or assistance, a low percent considering 84% percent of the 400 single mothers
agreed that education on handling money was a solution to getting off assistance
and 26% needed money to live on. |
|
|
|
|
One of the circumstances that caused women to apply for
assistance were medical problems and lack of a support system, yet just about
one-fifth of the organizations offered services targeting the physical and
mental well-being of individuals. As mentioned previously, 27% of organizations
offered programs on self-esteem. Less than one-fourth of responding
organizations offered mental/behavioral health counseling (23%), individual
counseling (22%), or family counseling (21%). Even fewer organizations offered
other related types of services - alcohol/drug counseling (17%), assertiveness
training (15%), and marriage counseling (12%). Only 9% offered medical care. |
|
|
|
|
As uncovered in the qualitative interviews, birth control
education could be used as a way to get people off financial assistance, however
only 13% of the responding organizations offered this service. |
|
|
|
|
Some organizations offered services for individuals in a
crisis situation, including spouse/child abuse counseling or prevention (18%),
transitional housing (15%), and a crisis shelter (12%). |
Conclusions
|
|
Single mothers have very basic needs for survival, including
financial assistance, employment, food, clothing, health care benefits, and
affordable housing. Quality child care and quality job training are also
important to helping them gain independence. Although programs do exist to help
them in these basic areas, based on the responding organizations, the incidence
of agencies providing these services is low throughout the entire Milwaukee
County. |
|
|
|
|
In addition, single mothers are not always aware of where to
go for help or what programs are available. Increased awareness of other sources
of assistance, other than those through state or county programs, is important
so that quality programs and services are accessible and available to everyone.
This may also reduce the burden on state and county programs that are carrying
the major load. |
|
|
|
|
More attention should be focused on the issue of single
mothers securing their future success, not just their day-to-day
existence. Based on this research, it appears single mothers want increased
educational opportunities, quality job training, quality jobs, and quality child
care (affordable); they want to move beyond satisfying their immediate needs for
food, clothing, and housing. They stressed the path to lasting financial
independence is not secured by just "any job." Low income single
mothers understand financial independence is directly related to a higher level
of education and training that will help them succeed at higher level jobs. |
|
|
|
|
Single mothers claimed a satisfying and challenging job
(versus a dead-end, minimum wage job without health insurance) would improve
their self-esteem and confidence, improve their family life ("be a positive
role model for my kids") and allow for quality time with their family
(rather than working three jobs to provide a bare existence). This
self-supporting attitude may also trickle down to future generations,
communicating that self-empowerment is the key to opportunities and success in
life. |
Companion Documentation Includes:
|
This summary is based on the information provided by the responding
organizations. Perhaps if
more organizations had responded, the results would be different.
The fact that many did not respond has implications not only for
this study, but also for low income single mothers, who already have
challenges accessing "the system." |
|